|
- af Lene Bang, 17. august 2026 - in English below
Så kan det vel næppe blive mere gennemskueligt med del og hersk. Man tillader ulve at brede sig i Danmark, hvor man nu skal finde sig i, at ens husdyr bliver ædt af ulve, og man bliver udskammet, hvis ikke man sætter kostbare og grimme kæmpehegn op. Folk stopper med at holde dyr, for får og heste er et tagselvbord for dem. De skræmmer befolkningen og indskrænker den frie bevægelighed. Så får ministeren skudt en "problemulv" og fremviser den på en lit de parade og straks kommer mange op i det røde felt over hvor synd det er for ulven, for hvem hader ikke at se døde dyr? Men der er mange andre dyr, som har måttet lade livet på grund af, at ulven naturligvis skal have noget at spise. Den er ikke ond, bare sulten.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2026-07-02-flere-end-1200-husdyr-draebt-af-ulven-sidste-aar-det-er-ikke-ulvens-skyld-siger-alternativet
Hvis en ulv var sluppet ud af zoologisk have, så var haven blevet evakueret indtil den var indfanget, men det er efterhånden ikke længere politisk korrekt at holde fast i, at MENNESKET KOMMER FØRST.
I en god verden havde ulve aldrig fået lov til at yngle i lille, tætbeboede Danmark. Men vi lever ikke i en god verden, hvor fornuften råder, men i en verden, hvor mørkets magter gør alt for at splitte os og se, hvor langt de kan få os til at gå. Nu kan vi så slås om ulves eksistensberettigelse i dette vel tilrettelagte opmærksomhedsslugende og iscenesatte drama, mens man i mellemtiden, bag vores ryg stjæler endnu, endnu mere af vores frihed. Nu handler det pludselig om, om du er for eller imod ulve, som man kalder ”naturen”, og ikke om:
- datacentre så vi kan overvåges og kontrolleres som slaver,
- indførelse af digital id,
- fortsat injicering af befolkningen med giftsprøjter,
- formuer, der kanaliseres ud af landet til gustne formål,
- folk fyldes med kemi i luft, vand og mad,
- børn der bliver hjernevasket i skolen med 72 køn,
osv. osv. osv. i det hele taget vil de se, hvor meget vi går med til, så de kan gennemføre World Economic Forums Agenda 2030, You will own nothing, have no privacy and be happy,. Problem, reaktion, løsning. Jeg har et forslag:
Nogle jyder foreslår, at man transporterer ulve til Sjælland. Vi er mange på Sjælland, der ikke helt forstår, at der overhovedet skal være ulve udenfor zoologisk have. Jeg vil derfor foreslå, at jyder på en blid og kærlig måde, bedøver og indfanger alle ulve, nedtager alle hegn, og kører hele molevitten til øen Slotsholmen, som Christiansborg ligger på.
Den er i forvejen omgivet af vand, men for en sikkerheds skyld må man hellere opsætte tre en halv meter høje, ulvesikre hegn og døgnbevogtede sikkerhedsporte. Ulvene vil helt sikkert trives i deres nye revir, hvor de vil have fri adgang til alle slottets gemakker.
Det vil betyde meget for biodiversiteten på øen, for i øjeblikket er der ikke rigtigt nogen dyr på Slotsholmen. Måske en lille politikerhund, men den er jo bare en lille ulvesnack. Politikerne har åbenbart brug for fællesskabet med ulven, ja de mener åbenbart, at skal den endda sættes over mennesket. Mennesker er jo blevet umoderne, der er brug for naturlige fjender, og ulve kan fint hjælpe med at nedbringe overbefolkningen blandt politikere og deres mange spin doktorer, så vi kunne spare nogle lønninger.
Ulve er meget inkluderende, de skelner ikke mellem hvilket parti, hvilken etnicitet, eller hvilken kønsidentitet, deres middagsmad tilhører. Måske foretrækker de velnærede, frem for magre politikere, men jeg tror ikke de er racister.
Politikere ved godt, hvilken gave ulve er for jyder, derfor må man forvente, at de vil være begejstrede for dette forslag, men hvis de alligevel, imod al sund fornuft, skulle føle sig utrygge ved ulve når de pludselig møder dem i deres eget territorium, så må det være tegn på psykisk instabilitet og her kan den nye præst måske hjælpe med noget sjælesorg. Ellers må man ansætte en eller flere psykologer, som kan hjælpe politikerne med deres ambivalente følelser. I yderste konsekvens kunne man bede Bill Gates om at opfinde en sikker og effektiv obligatorisk, næsten frivillig vaccine med ca. 1200 bivirkninger mod ulveskræk.
Når ulvene har forsynet sig i Snapstinget, vil det være naturligt, at de kaster sig over de smukke rideheste. De er velholdte og i god foderstand, så dem kan man godt være bekendt at byde ulvene. Når de har raseret staldene, kan de måske godt blive lidt nærgående overfor politikerne, men det skal man bare være glad og stolt over. Hvorfor skulle man ikke kunne "give en hånd til ulvene".
Hvis flere politikere føler sig truet af ulve, kan de gå sammen om et omvendt borgerforslag, nemlig et ”politikerforslag”, hvor jyder skal bestemme, om de må have lov til, i meget begrænset omfang, at regulere problemulve. Det er ikke sikkert, de bliver enige lige med det samme.
Det tager nok for lang tid at lave dette forslag til et borgerforslag, og man kan også risikere, at det bliver nedstemt. Derfor må jyderne hjælpe politikerne ved selv at sætte projektet i gang. For de mange sjællændere, som ikke helt begriber charmen ved løsgående ulve, vil jeg foreslå, at man starter med hegnet og lågerne.
Lene Bang
-------
The Wolf Drama
It could hardly be any more transparent a case of ‘divide and rule’. Wolves are being allowed to spread across Denmark, where people now have to put up with their livestock being eaten by wolves, and are shamed if they do not erect expensive and unsightly giant fences. People are giving up keeping animals, as sheep and horses are a delicious buffet for the wolves. They are terrorising the population and restricting freedom of movement.
Then the minister has had a ‘problem wolf’ shot and parades it on a lit de parade, and immediately many people get up in arms about how sad it is for the wolf – after all, who doesn’t hate seeing dead animals? But there are many other animals that have lost their lives simply because the wolf, naturally, needs something to eat. Wolves are not evil, just hungry.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2026-07-02-flere-end-1200-husdyr-draebt-af-ulven-sidste-aar-det-er-ikke-ulvens-skyld-siger-alternativet
If a wolf had escaped from the zoo, the park would have been evacuated until it was recaptured, but it is no longer politically correct to insist that HUMAN LIFE COMES FIRST.
In an ideal world, wolves would never have been allowed to breed in small, densely populated Denmark. But we do not live in an ideal world where common sense prevails, but in a world where the forces of darkness are doing everything they can to divide us and see how far they can push us.
Now we can squabble over whether wolves have a right to exist in this well-orchestrated, attention-grabbing and staged drama, whilst in the meantime, behind our backs, they are stealing yet more of our freedom. Suddenly, it’s all about whether you’re for or against wolves – which they call ‘nature’ – and not about:
- data centres, so that we can be monitored and controlled like slaves,
- the introduction of digital ID,
- the continued injection of the population with toxic substances,
- fortunes being channelled out of the country for dubious purposes,
- people being exposed to chemicals in the air, water and food,
- children being brainwashed at school with the idea of 72 genders,
etc. etc. All in all, they want to see how much we’ll put up with, so they can implement the World Economic Forum’s Agenda 2030: ‘You will own nothing, have no privacy and be happy.’ Problem, reaction, solution. I have a suggestion:
Some people from Jutland are suggesting that wolves should be transported to Zealand. There are many of us in Zealand who do not quite understand why there should be any wolves outside a zoo at all. I would therefore suggest that the people of Jutland, in a gentle and loving manner, tranquillise and capture all the wolves, dismantle all the fences, and transport the whole lot to the island of Slotsholmen, on which Christiansborg Palace stands.
It is already surrounded by water, but to be on the safe side, it would be best to erect three-and-a-half-metre-high, wolf-proof fences and security gates manned around the clock. The wolves will certainly thrive in their new territory, where they will have free access to all the palace’s chambers.
This will mean a great deal for biodiversity on the island, as there are currently hardly any animals on Slotsholmen. Perhaps a little politician’s dog, but that’s just a tasty little snack for the wolves. Politicians apparently need to bond with the wolf; indeed, they seem to believe that it should even take precedence over humans. Humans have, after all, gone out of fashion; we need natural enemies, and wolves could well help reduce the overpopulation of politicians and their many spin doctors, so we could save on some salaries.
Wolves are very inclusive; they make no distinction between which party, ethnicity or gender identity their dinner belongs to. Perhaps they prefer well-fed politicians to skinny ones, but I don’t think they’re racists.
Politicians are well aware of what a blessing wolves are for the people of Jutland, so one would expect them to be enthusiastic about this proposal; but if, contrary to all common sense, they were nevertheless to feel uneasy about wolves when they suddenly encounter them in their own territory, this must be a sign of mental instability, and here the new vicar might perhaps be able to offer some pastoral care. Otherwise, one must appoint one or more psychologists to help the politicians deal with their ambivalent feelings. As a last resort, one could ask Bill Gates to invent a safe and effective compulsory – or rather, almost voluntary – vaccine with around 1,200 side effects to combat the fear of wolves.
Once the wolves have had their fill at the restaurant Snapstinget, it will be only natural for them to turn on the beautiful riding horses. They are well-looked-after and in good condition, so one can certainly offer them to the wolves. Once they have ravaged the stables, they might well become a little intimate towards the politicians, but one should simply be happy and proud of that. Why shouldn’t we be able to ‘lend the wolves a hand’?
If more politicians feel threatened by wolves, they can join forces to put forward a reverse citizens’ initiative – namely a ‘politicians’ proposal’ – whereby the people of Jutland can decide whether they should be allowed, to a very limited extent, to cull problem wolves. It’s not certain they’ll reach an agreement straight away.
It would probably take too long to turn this proposal into a citizens’ initiative, and there is also a risk that it would be voted down. That is why the people of Jutland must help the politicians by getting the project off the ground themselves. For the many people in Zealand who do not quite grasp the charm of free-roaming wolves, I would suggest starting with the fence and the gates.
Lene Bang
|
